Article 17: The History of English Literature-Modern Literary Movement -9. Cubism as a Modern Literary Movement

9. Cubism in Literature as a Modern Literary Movement

Introduction to Cubism

Cubism is most commonly known as a revolutionary movement in modern art, led by famous painters like Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque in the early 20th century. However, Cubism also had a significant impact on literature. In literary form, Cubism became a part of the broader wave of modernist experimentation, where writers tried to break away from traditional structures of storytelling and focused on new ways of representing reality.

Just like Cubist painters depicted objects from multiple perspectives at once, Cubist writers tried to present fragmented, non-linear, and multi-dimensional perspectives of reality. They rejected the straightforward narrative form, embracing abstraction, symbolism, and multiplicity of meaning. This made Cubism in literature one of the most experimental and complex movements within modern literature.

Historical Background of Cubism in Literature

Cubism in literature emerged in the early 20th century, mostly between 1907 and 1925, and overlapped with the larger Modernist Movement. This period was marked by huge changes in society, politics, philosophy, and art. The industrial revolution, World War I, and the growth of urban life had deeply changed how people viewed the world. Traditional beliefs about truth, reality, and beauty were being questioned.

In this changing world, artists and writers felt the need to represent reality in new, more complex ways. Just as visual artists like Picasso were breaking down the human figure into geometric shapes to show multiple sides at once, writers also began to use fragmented structures, repetition, and symbolism to show that reality is not a single, fixed idea but something that can be looked at from many angles.

Characteristics of Literary Cubism

Cubist literature does not follow a single set of rules. Instead, it shares some common features that make it different from traditional literary forms:

1. Fragmentation

One of the most important features of Cubist literature is fragmentation. Writers break down the structure of a story, poem, or essay into small, disconnected parts. These parts may not seem to connect at first, but together they create a full picture—just like a Cubist painting.

2. Multiple Perspectives

Cubist writers often present different points of view in a single work. This may include different characters telling the story, or even shifts in time and place, as if the writer is showing many angles of the same event.

3. Non-linear Narrative

Traditional literature usually follows a beginning-middle-end pattern. Cubist literature often breaks this pattern. Events may not be told in order. Flashbacks, sudden jumps in time, and scenes without clear explanation are common.

4. Use of Imagery and Symbolism

Cubist writers use a lot of images and symbols. The images are often not meant to be taken literally. Instead, they represent ideas, emotions, or mental states.

5. Abstraction

Like abstract art, Cubist literature often avoids realistic or detailed descriptions. Instead, it focuses on the essence or inner meaning of things, sometimes using vague or puzzling language.

6. Collage Technique

Inspired by visual artists, some Cubist writers used a collage technique in their writing. This means they mixed different voices, styles, and even different languages or texts to form a single work. This method adds complexity and shows how many ideas can exist at the same time.

Major Figures in Literary Cubism

Although Cubism was more dominant in painting, several important writers were influenced by Cubist ideas and techniques. Here are some of the most well-known names associated with literary Cubism:

1. Gertrude Stein (1874–1946)

Gertrude Stein is often called the founder of Cubist literature. Her work broke all traditional rules of grammar, sentence structure, and storytelling. In books like “Tender Buttons” (1914), Stein used repetition, abstraction, and experimental syntax to explore the meaning of everyday objects and emotions. Her writing reads like a verbal Cubist painting, offering many layers of meaning.

Example from Tender Buttons:

“A box. Out of kindness comes redness and out of rudeness comes rapid same question, out of an eye comes research, out of selection comes painful cattle.”

This kind of language does not follow logical rules, but it creates emotional and intellectual patterns that challenge readers to think in new ways.

2. Guillaume Apollinaire (1880–1918)

Apollinaire was a French poet and art critic closely linked to the Cubist movement in visual art. He supported artists like Picasso and Braque and introduced Cubist ideas into poetry. His most famous poetry collection, “Calligrammes” (1918), used visual poetry, where the layout of the words on the page forms images.

Apollinaire’s poems reflect Cubist ideas in their structure, subject matter, and form. He often mixed images, symbols, and perspectives, creating a multi-dimensional experience for the reader.

3. William Carlos Williams (1883–1963)

An American poet and doctor, Williams was influenced by both Cubism and Imagism. His poetry, especially in books like “Spring and All” (1923), shows a Cubist influence through fragmented imagery, unexpected line breaks, and a focus on everyday life as something complex and layered.

4. Ezra Pound (1885–1972)

Although more often linked with Imagism and Vorticism, Pound was also influenced by Cubist ideas. His poetry used multiple voices, fragmentation, and symbolic language to express deep philosophical and cultural themes.

His major work, “The Cantos,” is a long, complex poem that uses a Cubist-like approach in its non-linear narrative and collage of voices, cultures, and historical references.

5. James Joyce (1882–1941)

Joyce’s later works, especially “Ulysses” (1922) and “Finnegans Wake” (1939), are often seen as part of modernist experimentation that overlaps with Cubist principles. His use of stream of consciousness, shifting points of view, and linguistic innovation are similar to the Cubist approach of seeing things from many angles.

Cubism in Poetry vs. Cubism in Prose

Cubist techniques appear in both poetry and prose, but they are used in different ways:

Cubist Poetry

  • Focuses on visual form, rhythmic repetition, and symbolism.
  • Poets like Gertrude Stein and Apollinaire used poems as verbal paintings, arranging words in unusual ways to show ideas from many perspectives.

Cubist Prose

  • Often has non-linear plots, fragmented narration, and shifting voices.
  • Writers like James Joyce used stream of consciousness and inner monologue to present many viewpoints at once.

Cubism and Other Modernist Movements

Cubism in literature did not exist in isolation. It shared similarities with and influenced other literary movements:

Imagism

  • Focused on clear, sharp images and economy of language.
  • Like Cubism, it rejected traditional poetic forms.

Vorticism

  • Combined the energy of Cubism with dynamic, mechanical themes.
  • Ezra Pound promoted both Cubism and Vorticism in different ways.

Dadaism and Surrealism

  • These later movements used nonsense, randomness, and dream logic, which were also part of Cubist experimentation.
  • The rejection of logical structure in Cubism opened the door for even more radical experimentation in Dada and Surrealist writing.

Impact of Cubism on Modern Literature

Cubism helped change the way writers and readers thought about storytelling and poetry. Its influence can be seen in:

  • The development of stream of consciousness in fiction.
  • The rise of visual poetry and concrete poetry.
  • The use of fragmentation and non-linearity in postmodern literature.
  • The acceptance of experimental forms and free structure in 20th and 21st-century writing.

Writers like Samuel Beckett, Kathy Acker, and even postmodern novelists like Thomas Pynchon used techniques first explored by Cubist writers.

Criticism and Legacy of Literary Cubism

While Cubism in literature opened up exciting new possibilities, it also faced criticism. Some readers and critics argued that:

  • It was too abstract and hard to understand.
  • It lacked emotional depth or character development.
  • It was more about form than meaning.

However, over time, Cubism has come to be seen as a vital step in the evolution of modern literature. It encouraged writers to take risks, question rules, and see literature as an art form, not just a tool for storytelling.

Conclusion

Cubism in literature may not be as widely known as Cubism in painting, but it was a powerful and transformative force in modern literary history. By breaking apart traditional forms and embracing fragmentation, multiple perspectives, and abstraction, Cubist writers opened up new ways of thinking about language, meaning, and reality. From Gertrude Stein’s experimental prose to Apollinaire’s visual poetry, literary Cubism gave writers the freedom to explore the complexities of human experience in ways that had never been tried before. Its influence continues to shape literature today, reminding us that truth and beauty often lie in complexity, contradiction, and the unexpected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *