1. Introduction to William Hazlitt’s Romantic Legacy
William Hazlitt stands as one of Romanticism’s finest prose stylists and essayists. His Romantic criticism captures the passion and complexity of the period. Though not a poet, Hazlitt’s essays share the movement’s deep focus on emotion, imagination, and personal experience. In fact, he used his prose as a vessel for Romantic ideals. Through his literary criticism, political writings, and character sketches, he championed sincerity, genius, and truth. Moreover, he celebrated the individual mind and its power over rational systems. Hazlitt’s criticism moved beyond technical analysis to explore art’s emotional and moral power. For this reason, William Hazlitt as a romantic critic remains essential reading. His prose pulses with life, engaging heart and intellect alike. Because of his originality, he influenced generations of critics. Therefore, Hazlitt holds a permanent place in Romantic literary history. His critical voice shaped public opinion and supported Romantic artists in transformative ways.
2. Early Life and Intellectual Formation
William Hazlitt was born in 1778 into a scholarly, dissenting family. This upbringing shaped his independent thought and rebellious spirit. His early studies in philosophy, especially under thinkers like John Locke and David Hartley, laid a rational foundation. However, Hazlitt soon turned toward emotion, imagination, and the arts. Importantly, he was influenced by the French Revolution and its ideals of liberty and justice. These themes later infused his Romantic criticism. He initially aimed to become a painter but shifted to writing. That artistic training sharpened his sensitivity to form, expression, and aesthetics. Notably, his encounters with Coleridge and Wordsworth in 1798 were transformative. These poets awakened his passion for literature and the Romantic spirit. Their influence steered him toward criticism as a creative act. Therefore, Hazlitt’s early life formed a strong base for William Hazlitt as a romantic critic to flourish later.
3. Meeting Coleridge and Wordsworth
Hazlitt’s 1798 visit to Alfoxden, where he met Coleridge and Wordsworth, changed everything. At the time, he was only twenty. Yet, the impact of that meeting lasted for decades. He was captivated by Coleridge’s voice, ideas, and presence. Likewise, Wordsworth’s poetic philosophy inspired him deeply. These encounters introduced him to the core of Romantic ideals. As a result, Hazlitt began viewing literature not as craft alone but as moral and spiritual force. These experiences led directly to the themes found in William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. The power of imagination, the depth of feeling, and the sacredness of personal truth—all these entered his critical lexicon. Although his friendships with Coleridge and Wordsworth later soured, the initial influence endured. They helped Hazlitt find his voice as a Romantic thinker. Consequently, this meeting served as a creative ignition point for Hazlitt’s literary journey.
4. Transition from Philosophy to Criticism
Originally trained in philosophy, Hazlitt shifted toward literary criticism in the early 1800s. This change allowed him to merge rational inquiry with emotional insight. While his philosophical roots never disappeared, they became tools to serve literature. Through criticism, Hazlitt found an outlet to examine the human condition. He moved beyond abstraction and embraced art’s immediacy. This shift defines William Hazlitt as a romantic critic as both intellectual and passionate. Importantly, his philosophical training gave his prose a structured, logical edge. Yet, he avoided cold analysis. Instead, he celebrated intuition, beauty, and the imagination. In his hands, criticism became art. As a result, Hazlitt’s work helped transform criticism into a Romantic genre. Many of his essays display a poetic rhythm and depth of feeling. Therefore, his transition marks a pivotal moment. It allowed him to express Romantic ideals while maintaining clarity and analytical power.
5. Style and Language in Hazlitt’s Essays
William Hazlitt’s prose style is one of his greatest achievements. It is vivid, urgent, and deeply personal. Each sentence pulses with conviction and feeling. He combined classical clarity with Romantic passion. Moreover, he used rhetorical devices, balanced structures, and imaginative metaphors with great skill. His sentences often begin in logic and end in emotion. This fusion defines William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. Because his style was so accessible and engaging, he reached broad audiences. Hazlitt wrote for the mind, but also for the ear and heart. Transition words guided his arguments fluidly. Therefore, his criticism flowed naturally, even when dealing with complex ideas. His tone ranged from lyrical to biting, depending on the subject. In all cases, his voice remained unmistakably his own. As a result, Hazlitt’s essays not only explained literature—they embodied it. His language turned criticism into an expressive, Romantic art form.
6. Championing Individual Genius
Central to William Hazlitt as a romantic critic is the belief in individual genius. He believed true art sprang from the depths of personal experience and emotion. As such, he admired artists who defied norms and followed their inner visions. For Hazlitt, Shakespeare, Milton, and Rousseau were icons of creative power. He rejected formulaic art and conventional judgment. Instead, he argued that greatness arises from spontaneity and truth. Furthermore, he saw genius as a gift that could not be taught or imitated. This Romantic notion deeply informed his reviews and essays. Whether discussing poets or painters, Hazlitt sought originality and intensity. He celebrated the rebel, the dreamer, the self-made artist. Therefore, William Hazlitt as a romantic critic became a vehicle to defend freedom of expression. His praise for genius inspired later critics to value intuition over tradition. Thus, Hazlitt advanced a core Romantic ideal: the sovereignty of the soul.
7. The Spirit of the Age
One of Hazlitt’s most famous works, The Spirit of the Age, reveals his Romantic critical philosophy. This book of character sketches captures the intellectual atmosphere of early 19th-century England. Rather than offering abstract analysis, Hazlitt paints vivid portraits of living thinkers. Each essay focuses on a single figure—Byron, Coleridge, Bentham, and more. Through these sketches, Hazlitt explores how personality and ideology shape public discourse. Importantly, he does not merely describe his subjects; he engages with their inner worlds. This psychological depth exemplifies William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. He reveals how genius operates within specific cultural and emotional contexts. Moreover, he judges his subjects by how fully they express their inner truths. As a result, The Spirit of the Age serves as both literary and cultural criticism. It highlights Hazlitt’s gift for combining empathy, insight, and bold judgment—all hallmarks of Romantic thought.
8. Hazlitt on Poetry
Hazlitt’s views on poetry reflect the emotional heart of Romanticism. He believed that poetry should stir the soul and express genuine feeling. In his essay “On Poetry in General,” he writes that poetry is “the language of the imagination and the passions.” This statement encapsulates William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. He valued poems not for technical perfection, but for emotional truth. Hazlitt admired poets like Shakespeare, Spenser, and Wordsworth when they transcended artifice. Additionally, he explored how poetic form could elevate ordinary experience into beauty. Though critical of pretentiousness, he revered sincerity. Moreover, he believed great poetry created moral insight and expanded human sympathy. This belief guided his reviews and shaped public taste. Because he argued from the heart, his criticism connected deeply with readers. Thus, Hazlitt helped define Romantic poetry not just as verse, but as vision.
9. Romanticism and Political Thought
William Hazlitt’s Romantic criticism intertwined with his radical politics. He believed deeply in liberty, equality, and human dignity. These convictions shaped his criticism of both art and society. Unlike some Romantics who turned inward, Hazlitt remained politically vocal. He criticized tyranny and hypocrisy while defending artistic freedom. His belief in the individual extended to political autonomy. Therefore, his Romanticism never separated from social justice. William Hazlitt as a romantic critic understood that literature must not ignore life’s harsh realities. Art, for him, carried ethical and political consequences. He praised works that championed human truth, not just technical brilliance. Consequently, Hazlitt’s criticism engaged with broader issues of power and morality. His political edge added urgency to his prose. In this way, he gave Romantic ideals real-world substance. Thus, William Hazlitt as a romantic critic proved that literature and politics could inspire one another meaningfully.
10. Critique of Neoclassicism
Hazlitt rejected the rigid order of Neoclassical aesthetics. He saw them as artificial and lifeless. Instead, he embraced the organic forms and emotional spontaneity of Romantic art. For Hazlitt, rules could never substitute for passion or genius. He believed that real beauty defied calculation. This rejection of classical form is central to William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. He argued that creativity must arise from the soul, not convention. He admired writers who broke rules to express personal truth. Hazlitt believed that truth and feeling outweighed symmetry and decorum. His essays frequently criticize poets who prioritized elegance over depth. As such, Hazlitt championed Romanticism’s rebellion against intellectualism. Through his criticism, he helped redefine literary standards. Therefore, William Hazlitt as a romantic critic became a powerful voice for emotional honesty. His opposition to Neoclassicism reinforced the Romantic turn toward freedom and subjectivity.
11. Shakespeare in Romantic Perspective
Hazlitt’s essays on Shakespeare remain some of his most celebrated works. He admired Shakespeare not only as a poet but as a psychologist. To Hazlitt, Shakespeare revealed the complexities of human emotion like no one else. In his view, characters lived, breathed, and felt deeply. This appreciation defines William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. He praised Shakespeare’s imagination, moral ambiguity, and psychological insight. Moreover, he saw the plays as democratic—they portrayed kings and clowns with equal dignity. Hazlitt’s Romantic lens brought fresh energy to Shakespearean interpretation. He analyzed characters like Hamlet and Othello as symbols of internal conflict. He explored how Shakespeare captured the universal human experience. Consequently, Hazlitt helped revive interest in Shakespeare during the Romantic period. His commentary shaped how readers and actors approached the Bard. Thus, William Hazlitt as a romantic critic gave Shakespeare new emotional depth and timeless relevance.
12. The Personal Essay as Romantic Form
Hazlitt transformed the essay into a Romantic art form. While earlier essays aimed for restraint and objectivity, his were intensely personal. He wrote as if speaking directly to the reader, revealing his own joys, frustrations, and beliefs. This openness defines William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. He saw criticism not as academic but as emotional dialogue. His essays blend memory, opinion, and literary insight with a conversational tone. As a result, the personal essay became a platform for Romantic expression. Hazlitt’s essays invited readers into the critic’s mind and heart. He wrote about walking, painting, politics, and love—all with literary passion. This fusion of self and subject broke traditional boundaries. Therefore, Hazlitt helped Romanticize the essay itself. His approach influenced later writers like Lamb, Emerson, and Orwell. William Hazlitt as a romantic critic showed that the critic’s soul could enrich every line.
13. Relationship with the Lake Poets
Hazlitt’s relationship with the Lake Poets—Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Southey—was complicated. He initially admired them deeply. Their poetry shaped his Romantic outlook. However, he later turned against them, especially over politics. Their conservatism clashed with his radical ideals. Still, Hazlitt’s critiques remained rooted in respect for their genius. This tension defines William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. He could admire poetic achievement while condemning ideological betrayal. He criticized Wordsworth’s egotism and Southey’s hypocrisy. Yet, he praised Coleridge’s early brilliance with genuine warmth. These complex judgments gave his criticism depth and honesty. Moreover, they reflected Romanticism’s internal conflicts—between art and politics, spirit and society. Hazlitt held Romantic writers to Romantic values. Therefore, William Hazlitt as a romantic critic showed intellectual courage. He loved Romanticism enough to critique its failures. His nuanced approach remains an example of integrity in literary discourse.
14. Writing on Imagination
For Hazlitt, imagination was the highest faculty of the human mind. It allowed individuals to transcend reality and enter emotional truth. He believed imagination fueled both art and morality. This belief is central to William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. He saw imagination not as escape, but as transformation. It enabled empathy, insight, and creative vision. In his criticism, Hazlitt highlighted imagination as the soul of poetry. He praised writers who could envision inner worlds vividly. Furthermore, he argued that imagination allowed readers to connect with others’ experiences. Therefore, literature became a bridge between minds and hearts. Hazlitt often used metaphors and analogies to explore imaginative processes. His prose imitated the movement of thought itself. This made his essays not just about imagination—but imaginative themselves. William Hazlitt as a romantic critic taught that true criticism should imagine as well as analyze.
15. Defense of the Common Reader
Hazlitt believed literature should reach the common person. He rejected elitism in both writing and criticism. His prose was clear, direct, and emotional—never pedantic. This democratic spirit defines William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. He believed that art belonged to everyone, not just scholars. He often defended popular taste against critical snobbery and argued that the untrained reader often sensed emotional truth more clearly than academics. Therefore, Hazlitt addressed his essays to real readers, not institutions. His reviews appeared in newspapers and magazines accessible to many. This made his Romantic criticism widely influential. He broke down barriers between high and low culture. As a result, William Hazlitt as a romantic critic helped shape public literary taste. His essays reminded readers that feeling, not jargon, defines great art. Consequently, he made Romantic values more inclusive and humane
16. Romantic Subjectivity in Criticism
Hazlitt championed subjectivity as essential to criticism. He believed a critic must respond with personal feeling, not detached logic. This marks William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. His essays are full of emotional honesty and personal insight. He did not hide his biases—he explored them. This transparency made his criticism more human and sincere. Hazlitt showed that subjective response could uncover deep artistic truths. He trusted instinct over formula and emotion over convention. His writing often blurs the boundary between analysis and confession. Because of this, readers feel his criticism as much as understand it. Romantic subjectivity gave his work vitality and originality. Hazlitt demonstrated that good criticism reflects the critic’s soul. Thus, William Hazlitt as a romantic critic proved that art, like life, thrives on feeling. His method reshaped criticism into a deeply Romantic and deeply personal practice.
17. Style and Language in Hazlitt’s Essays
Hazlitt’s prose is energetic, direct, and emotionally rich. His language flows with rhythm, image, and clarity. This style reinforces William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. He avoided cold academic tone. Instead, he wrote with fire, using metaphor, analogy, and vivid examples. His sentences mirror the movement of thought and passion. He often employed contrast to sharpen his points. Moreover, he balanced elegance with intensity. His choice of words revealed both intellect and emotion. Hazlitt’s style made criticism feel alive. It invited readers to feel what he felt, not just think what he thought. That literary grace reflected Romantic ideals—art must move the heart. Consequently, his prose became a model for later critics. His style combined Romantic sincerity with classical control. Therefore, William Hazlitt used language not just as a tool. He used it as a form of art itself.
18. Influence on Later Critics
Hazlitt’s critical legacy influenced many modern essayists and reviewers. Writers like Matthew Arnold, George Orwell, and T.S. Eliot drew from his approach. His emotional honesty and stylistic power became standards in literary journalism. William Hazlitt as Romantic critic left more than commentary—he shaped how we understand criticism itself. He bridged literature and life. Later critics admired his fearless voice and moral clarity. Hazlitt’s rejection of academic coldness inspired a more human criticism. His work also influenced American thinkers like Emerson and Thoreau. Moreover, he helped define the essay as a literary form, not just commentary. His influence reached beyond Romanticism into realism, modernism, and even postmodernism. He taught critics to trust their own impressions, not rely solely on theories. William Hazlitt as a romantic critic remains a vital figure in critical history. His spirit echoes in every critic who writes with passion.
19. Romantic Contradictions in Hazlitt
Hazlitt embodied many Romantic contradictions. He was both idealist and realist, radical and melancholic. He believed in beauty yet exposed cruelty. These tensions define William Hazlitt as a romantic critic. His work reflects the Romantic struggle between emotion and intellect. He longed for truth but was haunted by disillusionment. Hazlitt’s own life mirrored the turmoil he described in others. He admired genius but often felt excluded from literary circles. His loneliness fed his insight. Moreover, he idealized love but wrote bitterly of heartbreak. These contradictions gave his essays complexity and depth. He captured the fragile balance between hope and despair. Through this, Hazlitt showed how criticism could embrace emotional conflict. Therefore, William Hazlitt as a romantic critic offered not just interpretation—but vulnerability. He made criticism an art of inner honesty, even when painful.
20. Legacy of William Hazlitt as a Romantic Critic
William Hazlitt remains one of the most powerful voices of Romantic criticism. His essays helped define what Romanticism means in literature. He blended passion, intellect, and politics into a rich critical voice. Today, William Hazlitt as a romantic critic stands as a bridge between eras. His belief in imagination, individuality, and emotional truth still resonates. He showed that criticism could be both personal and universal. His legacy continues in every critic who writes with sincerity and fire. Hazlitt made criticism more than commentary—he made it a form of self-expression. His fearless judgments and lyrical style set new standards. Moreover, he gave Romantic ideals critical depth. He believed literature mattered because life mattered. William Hazlitt as a romantic critic taught us that beauty and truth must always meet. Therefore, his voice endures as a timeless guide in literary thought.
Thomas Moore as a Romantic Writer: https://englishlitnotes.com/2025/07/26/thomas-moore-as-a-romantic-writer/
Grammar Puzzle Solved by Naeem Sir: http://grammarpuzzlesolved.englishlitnotes.com