Background of Chaucer’s Parliament of Fowls

Chaucer composed The Parliament of Fowls during the late 14th century, and the poem connects love with political and philosophical concerns. The allegorical framework presents a dream vision where birds gather on Saint Valentine’s Day to choose partners. Importantly, the poem reflects medieval courtly love and the intellectual climate shaped by scholastic debates. Consequently, the scene of debate unites entertainment with moral reflection. The symbolic contest of the three eagles in Parliament exemplifies this duality. Moreover, Chaucer adapts European traditions of allegorical assembly, blending French and Italian influences with his distinctive English style. The background reveals not only a literary experiment but also a philosophical meditation on human choice. Therefore, the three eagles in Parliament become essential for understanding Chaucer’s intentions. Furthermore, by combining humor, debate, and moral symbolism, Chaucer presents a poem that resonates beyond its immediate audience and time.

Allegory and the Role of Eagles

Allegory dominates Chaucer’s work, and The Parliament of Fowls thrives on layered symbolic meaning. The three eagles in Parliament embody different aspects of love and rivalry. Their dispute over the formel eagle highlights both individual desire and collective order. Additionally, allegory transforms these birds into representatives of human passions, social structures, and political competition. Consequently, the poem transcends literal bird imagery and critiques broader questions of hierarchy and loyalty. Moreover, the conflict reveals the intersection of personal affection with political organization. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament remind readers of the tensions within both romance and governance. Furthermore, the allegorical representation invites reflection on justice, authority, and patience. Chaucer uses this scene to illustrate the challenges of choice and the balance between passion and reason. In this way, allegory provides a lens through which the eagles’ struggle acquires lasting importance.

Symbolism of the Eagle Contest

Symbolism enriches the poem, and the contest among the three eagles in Parliament illustrates the complexity of desire. Each eagle represents a suitor appealing for the formel eagle’s affection. Moreover, their speeches symbolize competing approaches to love: loyalty, urgency, and noble patience. Consequently, the symbolic framework enables Chaucer to present multiple perspectives within a single episode. Additionally, the eagles embody both virtues and flaws, offering insight into medieval ideals of masculinity and courtship. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament symbolize more than competition; they illustrate how love functions as both a private yearning and a public performance. Furthermore, the symbolic debate reflects cultural anxieties about social roles and moral virtue. Chaucer skillfully balances humor with moral instruction, ensuring the symbolism remains accessible and profound. In this way, the eagle contest becomes one of the most memorable allegorical elements in the poem.

Historical Context of the Poem

Understanding the historical context clarifies the meaning of the three eagles in Parliament. Chaucer wrote during a time of shifting political alliances, dynastic uncertainty, and growing interest in philosophical debates. Therefore, allegories often doubled as political commentary. Consequently, the assembly of birds in the poem echoes real assemblies, where powerful voices competed for influence. Moreover, the three eagles in Parliament symbolize competing forces that might reflect dynastic rivals or political factions. While Chaucer avoids direct identification, the echoes of political tension remain clear. Additionally, the influence of Valentine’s Day traditions and courtly rituals shapes the poem’s focus on love and choice. Thus, historical context highlights how the symbolic bird debate extends beyond romance. Furthermore, the audience of Chaucer’s time would recognize these echoes, adding layers of meaning. In sum, the poem reflects both personal and political dimensions of medieval life through allegorical imagery.

5. The Role of the Formel Eagle

The formel eagle plays a central role in shaping the debate of the three eagles in Parliament. She represents not just feminine choice but also the moral complexity of decision-making. Moreover, she embodies reason, patience, and independence. Her refusal to make an immediate choice illustrates her strength and her wisdom. Consequently, her character emphasizes the importance of autonomy in love rather than blind surrender. Furthermore, the formel eagle highlights how female voices matter in allegorical discussions of love. By delaying her decision, she grants time for reflection and avoids unjust haste. Thus, her role demonstrates that desire cannot always dictate the final outcome. Additionally, the formel’s presence compels the three eagles in Parliament to reveal their values. Her position showcases the negotiation between power and freedom in relationships, making her the moral center of the debate.

6. Courtly Love and its Ideals

Courtly love influences Chaucer’s poetic vision, and the three eagles in Parliament illustrate its demands. Nobility, honor, and loyalty dominate their speeches, reflecting ideals circulating in medieval courts. Consequently, courtly conventions encourage suitors to compete with elaborate words rather than violent force. Moreover, this emphasis on rhetoric demonstrates how love serves as performance. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament illustrate the cultural practice of transforming private affection into public ritual. Additionally, courtly love demands service and sacrifice, themes woven into each eagle’s argument. Furthermore, the allegory warns of the potential conflicts caused by competing ideals. By linking rhetoric with symbolic identity, Chaucer critiques both the beauty and the strain of courtly devotion. Therefore, the eagle debate embodies not only affection but also the cultural expectations of nobility. Through this lens, the episode reveals both the inspiration and the burden of chivalric love.

7. The First Eagle’s Plea

The first eagle symbolizes steadfast loyalty in the debate of the three eagles in Parliament. His plea emphasizes enduring devotion and the promise of lifelong fidelity. Moreover, his speech reflects ideals of knightly service, where loyalty defines worth. Consequently, he represents stability, patience, and tradition. Additionally, his appeal suggests that time strengthens love rather than weakens it. Thus, the first eagle in the three eagles in Parliament functions as a defender of continuity. Furthermore, his words highlight the value of commitment in contrast to fleeting desire. However, Chaucer presents his loyalty not as unquestioned perfection but as one possible path among many. His symbolic role demonstrates how loyalty can inspire admiration while also seeming overly cautious. Ultimately, his character illustrates the strengths and limitations of traditional ideals of faithfulness. Through his speech, the audience contemplates the virtue of patience and enduring attachment.

8. The Second Eagle’s Demand

The second eagle in the contest among the three eagles in Parliament symbolizes urgency and passion. His speech reflects impatience, as he demands immediate acceptance of his love. Consequently, his words convey energy, but also impulsive recklessness. Moreover, his appeal illustrates the dangers of unchecked passion in love. Thus, his role demonstrates the tension between desire and reason. Additionally, his fiery rhetoric contrasts with the first eagle’s measured devotion, creating balance within the debate. Furthermore, his urgency embodies the restless nature of youthful longing. In this way, the second eagle enriches the symbolic spectrum of courtship. The three eagles in Parliament thereby reflect a variety of human emotions. Chaucer uses the second eagle to reveal the challenges of unbridled desire. Therefore, readers recognize both the appeal and the risk of choosing passion over prudence. His presence complicates the allegory and deepens the moral lesson.

9. The Third Eagle’s Nobility

The third eagle represents noble patience within the debate of the three eagles in Parliament. His appeal relies on chivalric ideals, emphasizing honor, dignity, and self-restraint. Consequently, his words demonstrate strength tempered by wisdom. Moreover, he argues for consideration, presenting himself as worthy through virtue rather than haste. Thus, the third eagle in the three eagles in Parliament embodies balance between passion and responsibility. Furthermore, his position highlights a refined understanding of courtship, where dignity must accompany desire. Additionally, his patient approach illustrates the value of self-control in love. Chaucer portrays him as a figure who bridges extremes, offering a vision of idealized nobility. However, his stance also risks appearing indecisive compared to the energy of rivals. Therefore, his nobility both inspires and frustrates. Ultimately, his character demonstrates how courtly values struggle to reconcile desire with ethical expectations in allegorical literature.

10. Female Agency and Medieval Context

The formel eagle’s agency highlights female independence within the allegory of the three eagles in Parliament. She refuses to conform to external pressure, demonstrating intellectual authority. Consequently, her choice reshapes the power dynamics within the assembly. Moreover, her resistance reflects broader cultural debates about women’s roles in medieval society. Additionally, her decision echoes the influence of Christine de Pizan and other early feminist voices. Thus, the formel eagle in the three eagles in Parliament symbolizes autonomy in love. Furthermore, her ability to delay the outcome reveals the strength of patience and reflection. Chaucer elevates her role beyond passive object, granting her moral superiority. Her decision not only prolongs the contest but also transforms it into a meditation on freedom. Therefore, the formel eagle becomes central in examining both allegory and reality. Her presence underscores the timeless importance of women’s voices in literary tradition.

11. The Assembly of Birds

The assembly of birds frames the conflict of the three eagles in Parliament, representing society itself. The gathering includes birds of all types, from noble to common. Consequently, this symbolic assembly mirrors the diverse voices in human communities. Moreover, the debate illustrates how collective dialogue mediates individual desires. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament highlight the challenges of personal choice within shared social frameworks. Additionally, the assembly demonstrates how decisions about love extend beyond private feelings into public scrutiny. Furthermore, the variety of bird voices reflects a medieval parliament, where different classes debated. Chaucer uses this device to emphasize harmony, diversity, and political commentary. Therefore, the allegory suggests that personal relationships always involve wider contexts. The assembly of birds highlights the tension between individual yearning and communal regulation, shaping the fate of the eagle debate.

12. Political Allegory in the Eagles

The three eagles in Parliament may symbolize political rivals of Chaucer’s time. Consequently, their speeches echo struggles for influence, loyalty, and succession. Moreover, the bird assembly resembles a parliament, offering another layer of allegory. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament reflect not only courtship but also dynastic competition. Additionally, Chaucer avoids clear identification, but audiences familiar with politics recognized parallels. Furthermore, the eagle contest highlights tensions between tradition, ambition, and noble responsibility. The allegory cleverly disguises commentary on power, reminding readers that love and politics intertwine. Therefore, the symbolic role of the eagles transcends romance, presenting insights into leadership and governance. Chaucer illustrates how allegorical birds can embody both romantic rivals and political figures. In this way, the poem remains relevant for its examination of ambition, justice, and balance in human communities.

13. Philosophical Dimensions of the Debate

Philosophy underlies the symbolic scene of the three eagles in Parliament, particularly themes of choice, free will, and divine order. Consequently, their debate raises questions about human agency. Moreover, the struggle illustrates how reason must guide passion. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament reflect the scholastic debates of Chaucer’s time. Additionally, their symbolic speeches demonstrate competing philosophies: loyalty as virtue, passion as vitality, and patience as balance. Furthermore, the formel eagle embodies rational judgment, delaying her decision with wisdom. Therefore, the allegory transforms into a philosophical reflection on love and ethics. Chaucer connects romantic allegory with intellectual inquiry, ensuring the poem engages both heart and mind. Ultimately, the eagle debate illustrates the medieval concern with reconciling freedom and divine providence. The allegory demonstrates that choices always bear moral weight, linking human emotion with eternal questions of justice.

14. The Role of Rhetoric

Rhetoric defines the contest among the three eagles in Parliament, as words replace violence. Consequently, speeches illustrate both persuasion and performance. Moreover, the eagles display eloquence shaped by courtly traditions. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament highlight how language becomes a tool of desire. Additionally, rhetoric reveals character: loyalty speaks steadily, passion speaks urgently, and nobility speaks with restraint. Furthermore, the reliance on words emphasizes the cultural importance of eloquence in medieval courts. Therefore, the allegory critiques both the beauty and manipulation of rhetoric. Chaucer illustrates how speeches can inspire admiration while concealing weakness. Moreover, the emphasis on words highlights the performative nature of love in aristocratic society. In this way, rhetoric deepens the allegory by demonstrating that persuasion influences choice as much as personal merit. The eagle debate thereby reflects the triumph and limitations of language in shaping human experience.

15. The Influence of Valentine’s Day

The three eagles in Parliament gather on Saint Valentine’s Day, a symbolic setting. Consequently, the event links romance with ritual celebration. Moreover, Valentine’s Day traditions emphasize choosing partners, making it ideal for this allegory. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament illustrate cultural practices surrounding love. Additionally, the festival highlights how society formalizes personal relationships. Furthermore, the timing emphasizes joy and festivity, contrasting with the seriousness of the debate. Chaucer uses Valentine’s Day to blend humor with moral reflection, ensuring the allegory remains entertaining. Therefore, the eagle contest becomes more than abstract philosophy; it reflects real traditions of partner selection. Moreover, the celebration reminds readers that love belongs both to nature and to cultural ritual. The festival of Saint Valentine enriches the allegory, situating the eagle debate within the seasonal and social rhythms of medieval life.

16. The Interplay of Nature and Reason

Nature presides over the assembly, shaping the outcome of the three eagles in Parliament. Consequently, the presence of Nature symbolizes divine order guiding love. Moreover, her authority emphasizes balance between passion and rational control. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament reflect the struggle of desire moderated by higher wisdom. Additionally, Nature’s intervention highlights the idea that choices must respect natural law. Furthermore, she represents harmony, ensuring that conflict does not collapse into chaos. Therefore, her role strengthens the allegory, connecting human love with universal order. Chaucer illustrates how natural authority moderates individual ambition, guiding both suitors and audience. Moreover, Nature’s authority contrasts with the freedom sought by the eagles, intensifying the debate. Her presence demonstrates that love is not only emotional but also cosmic. In this way, Chaucer presents a vision where individual desires exist within divine and natural boundaries.

17. Humor in the Debate

Humor shapes the allegory of the three eagles in Parliament, balancing serious philosophy with lively entertainment. Consequently, Chaucer blends satire with moral lessons. Moreover, the speeches of the eagles invite both admiration and laughter. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament reveal human folly disguised as noble rhetoric. Additionally, humor ensures accessibility for audiences, allowing the allegory to teach without solemnity. Furthermore, comic touches reflect the absurdity of exaggerated courtly love traditions. Therefore, humor strengthens the allegory by making it vivid and memorable. Chaucer demonstrates that laughter can illuminate truth as effectively as solemn argument. Moreover, humor reveals the gap between human ideals and realities. In this way, the eagle debate entertains while it critiques cultural practices. The balance of comedy and seriousness exemplifies Chaucer’s skill, ensuring that the poem resonates with readers of every background and interest.

18. Symbolic Patience and Delay

Patience becomes a central theme in the allegory of the three eagles in Parliament, embodied by the formel eagle’s refusal to choose. Consequently, delay becomes a symbolic act of wisdom. Moreover, patience contrasts with the urgency of passion and the demands of tradition. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament reflect the virtue of careful deliberation. Additionally, patience highlights the moral value of reflection before decision. Furthermore, the formel’s delay allows each eagle to demonstrate character. Therefore, the allegory suggests that true love requires time, not impulsive action. Chaucer elevates patience as a virtue equal to loyalty or nobility. Moreover, delay emphasizes freedom, ensuring the formel maintains authority over her choice. In this way, patience transforms from hesitation into strength. The allegory demonstrates that wisdom lies not in immediate decisions but in thoughtful reflection guided by reason and moral balance.

19. The Influence of Italian Poetry

Italian poetry influences Chaucer’s depiction of the three eagles in Parliament, particularly Dante and Boccaccio. Consequently, Chaucer adapts continental traditions for English audiences. Moreover, the eagle debate reflects themes of allegory and philosophical reflection found in Italian works. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament demonstrate cultural exchange shaping English literature. Additionally, Dante’s Divine Comedy inspired Chaucer’s dream-vision framework. Furthermore, Boccaccio’s Teseida influenced elements of romance and courtship. Therefore, Chaucer integrates foreign traditions into a distinctly English poetic form. His adaptation demonstrates creative transformation rather than mere imitation. Moreover, the eagle contest illustrates how literary influences merge into original allegory. In this way, the poem becomes a crossroads of European literary culture. The three eagles in Parliament thereby embody not only symbolic rivals but also Chaucer’s engagement with international traditions of poetry, allegory, and philosophy.

20. The Role of Common Birds

The common birds in the assembly contrast with the nobility of the three eagles in Parliament. Consequently, their voices introduce humor, realism, and social diversity. Moreover, they remind readers that not all love follows lofty ideals. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament exist within a spectrum of relationships. Additionally, the common birds criticize excessive rhetoric, mocking the pretensions of noble suitors. Furthermore, their presence highlights the universality of love, experienced across all classes. Therefore, the allegory balances elite traditions with popular perspectives. Chaucer ensures that both nobility and commoners find representation within the poem. Moreover, the common birds demonstrate how satire punctures aristocratic ideals. In this way, the assembly of birds mirrors medieval society, with competing voices shaping collective decisions. Their commentary enriches the allegory, ensuring the eagle debate resonates with both elevated and everyday realities of human love.

21. Conflict Between Desire and Duty

The three eagles in Parliament highlight conflict between passionate desire and moral duty. Consequently, each suitor embodies a different response to love’s demands. Moreover, their symbolic arguments illustrate how personal longing collides with ethical expectation. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament reflect enduring human struggles. Additionally, the formel eagle intensifies this conflict by asserting her right to delay. Furthermore, her wisdom emphasizes that desire must align with duty. Therefore, Chaucer presents a vision where emotion cannot exist without ethical reflection. His allegory demonstrates that true love balances yearning with responsibility. Moreover, the eagle debate shows that unchecked passion risks chaos, while blind loyalty risks stagnation. In this way, the allegory illustrates the constant tension between freedom and order. Through the symbolic eagles, Chaucer explores how individuals negotiate competing impulses of affection, honor, and obligation within complex relationships.

22. Unity and Discord in the Assembly

The assembly of birds reveals unity and discord within the allegory of the three eagles in Parliament. Consequently, the gathering demonstrates harmony when Nature presides, yet also discord when rivals clash. Moreover, the symbolic debate illustrates how communities must navigate conflict. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament show how rivalry disrupts unity but also enriches dialogue. Additionally, the presence of common birds emphasizes diversity, contrasting noble rhetoric with satire. Furthermore, this dynamic mirrors real parliaments, where many voices seek compromise. Therefore, the allegory underscores how debate reflects social order. Chaucer demonstrates that difference does not destroy community; rather, it reveals strength through dialogue. Moreover, unity arises not from eliminating rivalry but from respecting variety. In this way, the eagle contest reveals the paradox of assemblies: conflict divides, yet conversation unites. Chaucer transforms love rivalry into a meditation on political and social cohesion.

23. The Function of Time in the Poem

Time functions as a symbolic force in the allegory of the three eagles in Parliament. Consequently, the formel eagle delays her decision, granting time moral significance. Moreover, this delay illustrates wisdom, allowing passions to cool and reason to prevail. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament highlight the necessity of patience in love. Additionally, time demonstrates that immediate desire often leads to poor choices. Furthermore, Chaucer suggests that enduring love must survive beyond the moment of passion. Therefore, the allegory transforms time into a tool of ethical judgment. The formel’s delay contrasts with the suitors’ urgency, illustrating opposing approaches to courtship. Moreover, the assembly’s structure shows how time frames dialogue, extending conflict into reflection. In this way, Chaucer elevates time as a symbol of maturity. The three eagles in Parliament therefore embody the struggle to balance impatience with thoughtful consideration.

24. Divine Order and Human Choice

Divine order frames the allegory of the three eagles in Parliament, where Nature represents higher authority. Consequently, the debate reflects the tension between freedom and divine law. Moreover, the suitors illustrate how human choice must respect universal harmony. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament present freedom as real but limited. Additionally, the allegory demonstrates how divine order shapes even personal relationships. Furthermore, the presence of Nature reminds readers that choices carry cosmic significance. Therefore, Chaucer links earthly love with spiritual responsibility. His allegory insists that passion cannot exist outside moral structure. Moreover, the eagle contest shows how human freedom leads to conflict when unmoderated. In this way, Chaucer illustrates the balance between liberty and law. The symbolic presence of Nature affirms that individual will matters, yet divine order remains supreme in guiding human destiny.

25. Audience Reception in Medieval Times

Medieval audiences interpreted the three eagles in Parliament through layers of allegory. Consequently, they saw both romantic rivalry and political symbolism. Moreover, readers recognized reflections of courtly traditions, parliamentary debates, and dynastic concerns. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament engaged both personal and public interests. Additionally, audiences appreciated the humor of common birds mocking aristocratic pretension. Furthermore, they valued the moral lessons embedded within the allegory. Therefore, the eagle contest resonated across classes, offering entertainment and reflection. Chaucer skillfully addressed multiple audiences, ensuring relevance for nobility, clergy, and common readers. Moreover, the allegory encouraged audiences to examine their own values of loyalty, passion, and patience. In this way, the poem’s success depended on its layered meaning. The three eagles in Parliament therefore secured Chaucer’s reputation. He balanced humor, philosophy, and social commentary with skill.

26. Modern Interpretations of the Eagles

Modern critics reinterpret the symbolism of the three eagles in Parliament. Consequently, some emphasize political allegory, while others focus on gender dynamics. Moreover, contemporary analysis highlights the formel eagle’s agency as a feminist statement. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament invite ongoing reevaluation. Additionally, modern readers see the allegory as satire of excessive courtly rhetoric. Furthermore, interpretations stress the timelessness of its themes: choice, rivalry, and authority. Therefore, the eagle contest remains relevant, illustrating universal struggles of human relationships. Chaucer’s allegory transcends medieval context, offering insights into power, love, and freedom. Moreover, modern scholarship emphasizes intertextual influences from Dante and Boccaccio, enriching interpretation. In this way, the three eagles in Parliament remain vital for literary study. Their debate reflects not only medieval concerns but also modern questions about individuality, equality, and the complexities of desire.

27. The Balance of Justice and Mercy

Justice and mercy balance within the allegory of the three eagles in Parliament. Consequently, each suitor seeks judgment, yet the formel eagle tempers authority with compassion. Moreover, Nature supervises, ensuring fairness without cruelty. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament illustrate how justice must consider mercy. Additionally, the allegory demonstrates that authority gains legitimacy through fairness. Furthermore, the symbolic debate illustrates the moral value of compassion in relationships. Therefore, Chaucer connects personal affection with ethical responsibility. His allegory reminds readers that true love cannot flourish without justice moderated by mercy. Moreover, the eagle contest reflects broader questions of governance, where rulers must combine authority with kindness. In this way, Chaucer’s allegory resonates beyond romance, offering political wisdom. The three eagles in Parliament thereby symbolize the challenge of uniting strength with gentleness, creating harmony from rivalry.

28. Lessons of the Eagle Debate

The three eagles in Parliament provide lessons about love, patience, and decision-making. Consequently, the allegory teaches that passion must yield to wisdom. Moreover, loyalty and nobility matter, but freedom and reflection matter equally. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament symbolize the importance of thoughtful choice. Additionally, the allegory illustrates that delay does not weaken love but strengthens it. Furthermore, the symbolic speeches demonstrate competing virtues, each with merit. Therefore, the lesson emerges: no single ideal dominates love. Chaucer illustrates that relationships require negotiation, balance, and respect. Moreover, the eagle contest reveals how allegory can instruct while entertaining. In this way, the poem functions as both art and moral guide. Readers gain insight into their own desires. They witness the symbolic conflict. They discover that wisdom often lies in patience. It does not lie in impulsive decision.

29. The Place of the Poem in Chaucer’s Works

The three eagles in Parliament highlight Chaucer’s creative experimentation within his body of work. Consequently, the poem bridges continental influences with English originality. Moreover, it demonstrates his skill in combining humor, allegory, and philosophy. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament stand alongside his greatest achievements. Additionally, the poem anticipates themes later expanded in The Canterbury Tales. Furthermore, it reflects Chaucer’s ability to address political, social, and romantic issues within one allegory. Therefore, the eagle contest showcases his innovation in dream vision poetry. Moreover, the allegory demonstrates his mastery of layered meaning, appealing to diverse audiences. In this way, the poem secures Chaucer’s reputation as a central literary figure. The three eagles in Parliament remain essential for understanding his artistry. They play a crucial role in shaping English literature during the medieval period.

30. Conclusion: Symbolism and Legacy

The symbolism of the three eagles in Parliament defines the lasting power of Chaucer’s allegory. Consequently, their rivalry illustrates universal conflicts of love, power, and freedom. Moreover, the formel eagle’s choice demonstrates the value of patience and agency. Thus, the three eagles in Parliament continue to inspire literary interpretation. Additionally, their symbolic roles embody both medieval courtly ideals and timeless human struggles. Furthermore, the assembly of birds transforms romance into a meditation on politics, philosophy, and society. Therefore, Chaucer’s allegory remains vital, bridging past and present. Moreover, the lessons of loyalty, passion, and nobility resonate across centuries. In this way, the poem endures as a masterpiece of symbolic literature. The three eagles in Parliament represent Chaucer’s creative brilliance. They also signify the enduring power of allegory to explore love. Justice and human identity are also themes explored.

The Female Eagle’s Choice in The Parliament of Fowls:

https://englishlitnotes.com/2025/05/14/female-eagle-choice-parliament-of-fowls/

Notes on English for All Classes: https://englishwithnaeemullahbutt.com/

For more educational resources and study material, visit Ilmkidunya. It offers guides, notes, and updates for students: https://www.ilmkidunya.com/